
|
At and
leading up to the original special assessment meeting of October 14,
2004, all
the information regarding the assessment was made available to all
owners. This serves as a repeat of that
information to
bring everyone back up to speed. Who, What and Why In 2003,
after having received numerous complaints from various parts of the
Mews
regarding both trees and drainage problems, it became apparent to the
board
that they were going to have to get some help figuring out how to
address the
growing number of problems. This led
them ultimately to consult with Valley Crest, the Mews current
landscaping
contractor, after finding out they had the requisite experts on staff
to
determine the scope of the issues. The
entire common area of the Mews was walked and every tree and drainage
area was
examined. In the
meanwhile it was also discovered that long term maintenance of the
trees and
the potential development of drainage problems in the common grounds
were never
addressed in the Association long term budget and consequently, no
reserve
money was ever set aside to address either of these issues. Putting a Proposal
together Now it
was becoming clear to the board that they were dealing with a sizable
issue and
going to have to make a proposal to the community in order to be able
to
resolve it. At the annual meeting in
May of 2004 they announced what they were working on and that a special
meeting
would be announced once they finished getting all pertinent information
together. Over the
ensuing months, the proposal from Valley Crest was completed and also
expanded
to roll in some extras at a reduced rate for having all the work done
at
once. Information was gathered regarding
the possibility of getting a loan to allow owners the option of paying
the
assessment over a three year period instead of one lump.
A proxy was drafted to be used as a voting
mechanism and finally the special meeting was called for October 14. In the
weeks leading up to the special meeting, the proposal from Valley Crest
was
made available for review by anyone who was interested (minus the
prices, since
the bid has not yet been awarded). On
October 14 the entire plan was presented and discussed at the special
meeting. Valley Crest was represented to
address specific questions any owners might have regarding any element
of the
proposal and the nature of the work to be done.
It was made clear that the bid from Valley Crest was
necessary in order
to be able to determine a ballpark cost to present to the owners, but
that once
the assessment was approved the bidding process would begin and they
might or
might not win the bid. It was also
stated that Valley Crest did not charge the Mews for all the work put
into the
proposal, and would not charge them unless they were not awarded the
bid. The plan
proposed to the community on October 14 was broken down into three
tiers to
give owners several levels of commitment to choose between. The
proxies collected at and leading up to the October 14th
meeting were
not sufficient to reach the quorum requirement of 90 (60% of 150) as
stated in
the covenants and bylaws. Since quorum
was only narrowly missed, however, the board was able to use the
proxies to
determine which of the three tiers was most popular with the community. Legal
Council was retained to ensure that the process going forward would be
completely in line with the Covenants and By-laws.
A new meeting was convened on April 26th,
2005 for the purposes of voting on the Special Assessment and an
increase in
the Annual Assessment. New,
simplified proxies were drawn up which included only the highest level
of
Special Assessment from the previous meeting and the Annual Assessment
increase. Through
attendance and advance proxies, quorum requirements were met for this
meeting. More
than two-thirds of the voters approved the increase in the Annual
Assessment. The Special Assessment fell
short of the required two-thirds of voters by 8 votes. What now? The
challenge facing the new Board of Directors will be to find a way to
“Cause the
Common Area to be maintained”, one it’s duties as stated in the
by-laws, in a
way that will be agreeable to as many owners in the Mews as possible. |